Erkr How Long Can Theresa May Hold On as Prime Minister
By Scott SonensheinFebruary 16, 2017 5:43 AM ESTAsk most people to describe the path to success and their answer will likely call for moremore money to buy things, more time to do things and more knowledge to inform things. There an intuitive appeal to this argument. In terms of success, more is thought to be both a cause the more we have, the more we can do and a consequence to the victor go the spoils .As alluring as this approach appears, recent research has started to call it into question. When we are focused on getting more, we overlook the value of what already in hand. We emphasize the wrong things, like accumulating resources instead of taking productive steps to accomplish our goals. Over time, the more approach makes us less adaptive and less satisfied.There another way to achieve success: the science of [url=https://www.stanley1913.com.es]stanley cup[/url] stretching offers an effective, more fulfilling alternative that invigorates us to do more without needing more. It draws from a range of research to e [url=https://www.stanley-cups.com.es]stanley cup[/url] xplain why some people can do a lot with little while others squander so much. Stretching involves practical techniques and tools anyone can learn to use to acc [url=https://www.cup-stanley.de]stanley cup[/url] omplish more with what we already have.When we stretch, we engage with our resources. We see their potential rather than worry about their perceived limitations. This helps unlock even greater possibilities for what already in handwhether it time, money, materials or even rela Ktvo These People Just Took a Selfie From Space
David Keating of the Center for Competitive Politics testifies during a Senate hearing highlighting abuses in the public financing of campaigns on May 7, 2013, in Albany, N.Y.Mike Groll鈥擜PBy Alex AltmanMay 13, 2015 10:09 AM EDTThe mastermind behind the super PAC has no regrets. My only regret is the backlash, David Keating says with a wry smile.Keating is one of the most influential political activists you ;ve never heard of. He was the architect of a federal lawsuit that ended in a landmark 2010 court ruling that reshaped the way elections are run. The case, SpeechNow.org vs. FEC, scr [url=https://www.airmaxplus.us]air max 1[/url] apped annual limits on individual contributions to campaign advocacy groups, ushering in the era of super PACsmdash;political-action committees that can raise unlimited sums as long as they don ;t coordinate directly with parties or candidates.Five years later, campaigns are only beginning to harness the power of Keating creation. In the 2016 presidential race, virtually all of the candidates will have companion super PACs, many of which will wield more influence than the campaigns themselve [url=https://www.nikeairforce.es]af1[/url] s. Candidates have leveraged super PACs to supercharge fundraising, pay for staff salaries and trips to primary states and even assume the duties once reserved for [url=https://www.adidasoriginal.it]adidas originals[/url] the campaigns themselves, from running TV ads and organizing supporters to direct mail campaigns and digital microtargeting.Many of these innovations have surprised Keating, a soft-spoken man with a graying beard. B